George E. Wakeman, Jr. is a highly regarded trial attorney concentrating in medical malpractice, product liability, pharmaceutical and medical device liability, repetitive stress liability, and other general litigation areas. George’s practice also includes representation of health care professionals before licensing and administrative boards. Additionally, he has been invited to lecture before various groups on the subject of trial practice. He has been an arbitrator for the American Arbitration Association since 1984, an instructor for the Harvard Law School Trial Advocacy Program since 1988, and an instructor for the MCLE/NITA Trial Advocacy Program since 1992. George is also frequently asked to lecture at Grand Rounds at hospitals in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, individual physician's groups and insurance carriers, including presentations outside the United States. George has also authored a number of articles on various legal issues and areas regarding medical issues.
George was selected, based on a vote of licensed attorneys in Massachusetts and Rhode Island and review by an independent blue ribbon panel, as a "Super Lawyer", as published in Boston Magazine 2004 - 2017 and was selected as a New England "Super Lawyer" in 2007-2017 George was also selected as a Rhode Island “Super Lawyer,” 2011-2017 George has also been selected for inclusion in "The Best Lawyers in America", 2007 - 2018 and in the 2008-2014 Boston's Best Lawyers.
Awards & Recognition
- "Super Lawyer", as Published annually in Boston Magazine (2004 - 2018)
- New England "Super Lawyer" (2007 - 2018)
- "The Best Lawyers in America" (2007 - 2018)
- Boston's Best Lawyers (2008 - 2014)
- Elected by vote of peers into American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA) at the Advanced Advocate level (2009 - 2013)
- Top 100 Lawyers in Massachusetts as published by Boston Magazine
- Lifespan Department of Risk Management, Insights Magazine, Defending Malpractice Claims: It’s Not Just About the Medicine,” Winter 2015, Vol. 11, No. 1
Recent representative successful results obtained on behalf of George’s clients include the following:
Obtained a defense verdict on behalf of general surgeon in a case alleging significant personal injuries following a cervical lymph node biopsy and resulting cervical nerve injury. The case was tried in Plymouth Superior Court. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant negligently injured the cervical nerve during the biopsy resulting in pain, limitations on use of the right (major) arm and disfigurement. Plaintiff presented an expert in surgery from a major academic center in NY. The defense presented experts in general surgery and neurology from Tufts. After 5 days of trial, the jury returned a verdict in 35 minutes in favor of the defendant surgeon.
Obtained a judgment as a matter of law at the close of plaintiff’s evidence in favor of a major teaching hospital in Providence, RI. The suit was brought by a plaintiff who claimed that she fell in or near a mulch bed on the premises of the hospital, injuring her right hand, head, and right shoulder. The plaintiff argued that the hospital negligently maintained its premises, and she had no alternative other than walking through the mulch bed. The defense was able to demonstrate on cross-examination that the plaintiff could not identify what caused her to fall and by extension, how long the condition has existed. After two days of trial in the Providence Superior Court before Judge Procaccini, Attorneys Wakeman and Feeney were successful in obtaining a judgment as a matter of law and plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed.
Obtained a defense verdict on behalf of three radiologists in a case alleging wrongful death from a late diagnosis of invasive lobular breast cancer. The case was tried in Salem Superior Court. The plaintiff alleged that the three radiologists, all senior physicians at the major Boston teaching hospital, had failed to identify an abnormality in mammograms and specialty views in 2003, 2004 and 2005, resulting in the cancer having progressed to Stage IV with multiple sites of distant metastatic spread in 2006. Plaintiffs presented experts in radiology and medical oncology from major academic centers in NY, and the defense presented similar experts from Harvard and Tufts academic centers. The decedent lived for three years following her diagnosis but died at age 51, leaving a 15 year old son and husband, both of whom testified at trial. After 8 days of trial, the jury returned a verdict in 38 minutes in favor of all three radiologists.
Obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a cardiothoracic surgeon in a case alleging wrongful death after heart surgery. The case was tried in Suffolk Superior Court. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant's management and treatment of a patient who was three days post-op from open heart by-pass surgery and developed a collapsed lung requiring insertion of a chest tube was negligent. During the insertion of the chest tube, the patient arrested and died despite vigorous efforts to restart his heart, including open cardiac massage. After 7 days of trial, the jury returned a verdict in 48 minutes in favor of the defendant cardiothoracic surgeon.
- Suffolk University Law School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey
- Rhode Island
- U.S. District Court District of Connecticut
- U.S. District Court District of Massachusetts
- U.S. District Court District of Rhode Island